<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking not for the mouse, but for the edit button</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scrubnugget.com/2008/04/28/looking-not-for-the-mouse-but-for-the-edit-button/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scrubnugget.com/2008/04/28/looking-not-for-the-mouse-but-for-the-edit-button/</link>
	<description>these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chriswaterguy</title>
		<link>http://www.scrubnugget.com/2008/04/28/looking-not-for-the-mouse-but-for-the-edit-button/comment-page-1/#comment-6024</link>
		<dc:creator>Chriswaterguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrubnugget.com/?p=535#comment-6024</guid>
		<description>Glad to see television (the crippling electrode ray nipple) being replaced by  wikis and such, that enrich and create value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see television (the crippling electrode ray nipple) being replaced by  wikis and such, that enrich and create value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.scrubnugget.com/2008/04/28/looking-not-for-the-mouse-but-for-the-edit-button/comment-page-1/#comment-6023</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrubnugget.com/?p=535#comment-6023</guid>
		<description>/me comments on Cyde&#039;s blog and subscribes to Cyde&#039;s RSS feed.  Thanks for the link!

I see your point about lensing, but Clay&#039;s argument implies that this massive social shift (from passive to active cultural participation) is just beginning.  In that regard, TV viewership figures won&#039;t reflect the shift for another few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/me comments on Cyde&#8217;s blog and subscribes to Cyde&#8217;s RSS feed.  Thanks for the link!</p>
<p>I see your point about lensing, but Clay&#8217;s argument implies that this massive social shift (from passive to active cultural participation) is just beginning.  In that regard, TV viewership figures won&#8217;t reflect the shift for another few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.scrubnugget.com/2008/04/28/looking-not-for-the-mouse-but-for-the-edit-button/comment-page-1/#comment-6021</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrubnugget.com/?p=535#comment-6021</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve been discusisng this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2008/04/26/the-answer-to-where-do-people-find-the-time&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cyde&#039;s blog&lt;/a&gt;.  I personally think that Clay is experiencing a combination of lensing effects caused by his too-close proximity to Web 2.0 hubbub and his likely-atypical social companions.  Greg Maxwell pointed out that TV viewership is reportedly at all-time highs, which doesn&#039;t seem to jive with Clay&#039;s thesis.  It&#039;s a provocative piece, but I remain unconvinced that it is accurate in its conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been discusisng this on <a href="http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2008/04/26/the-answer-to-where-do-people-find-the-time" rel="nofollow">Cyde&#8217;s blog</a>.  I personally think that Clay is experiencing a combination of lensing effects caused by his too-close proximity to Web 2.0 hubbub and his likely-atypical social companions.  Greg Maxwell pointed out that TV viewership is reportedly at all-time highs, which doesn&#8217;t seem to jive with Clay&#8217;s thesis.  It&#8217;s a provocative piece, but I remain unconvinced that it is accurate in its conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.378 seconds -->

